A common problem in many statistics computations is
computing the multivariate normal distribution function
There is reliable and efficient software available for computing
for m = 1 and m = 2 (for m = 2 see Donnelly, 1973 and
Drezner and Wesolowsky, 1990), so assume m > 2.
Perhaps the simplest method uses acceptance-rejection
sampling,
but this is not expected to be efficient for high accuracy work.
Other methods for m > 2 use algorithms developed by
Deák(1980, 1986 and 1990), Schervish (1984) and Genz (1992). The
Schervish method has been compared with Genz's methods (Genz, 1992),
but Deák's methods have not been compared with the other methods.
Improvements to Genz's methods have recently been proposed by
Beckers and Haegemans(1992), and Gibson, Glasbey and Elston (1992).
The purpose of this
paper is to present results from tests comparing
acceptance-rejection sampling, Deák's methods,
Schervish's methods and improved versions of Genz's methods.
In Section 2 brief descriptions of the different methods are given,
in Section 3 test results are reported and Section 4 provides some
concluding remarks.